How to Scale Your Business Without Burning Out

How to Scale Your Business Without Burning Out

Key Lessons from the Executive Edge Live Panel on Sustainable Growth

Scaling a business is exciting—but for many founders, growth quietly turns into chaos, burnout, and stalled execution.

In this Executive Edge Live panel, hosted by Harley Green, Founder & CEO of Workergenix, four seasoned operators and advisors share what actually makes growth scalable, sustainable, and leadership-friendly.

If you’re a founder or CEO planning to scale in 2026, here’s what you need to know.

Preferred listening on the go? Catch the full podcast episode on Spotify and Apple Podcasts.

Vision Isn’t the Problem—Capacity Is

Most leaders don’t lack vision. They lack bandwidth.

When everything runs through the founder, growth plans collapse under calendar overload and decision fatigue. The panel emphasized planning around real capacity, not hope.

Takeaway: If your time is maxed out, your growth plan is fiction.

Leaders Consistently Underestimate Risk, Time, and Cost

Entrepreneurs are wired to take risks—but that strength is also a liability.

Philip Williams (The Numbers Advisors) shared that most leaders underestimate how long and how expensive scaling will be.

Rule of thumb: Add 50% more time and money to your growth plan.

Sustainable growth requires financial discipline, contingency planning, and advisors who will challenge assumptions.

Scaling Requires the Right People—Not Just More People

Growth exposes talent gaps fast.

Justin Janowski (Faith2Influence) highlighted one of the hardest leadership responsibilities: letting go of the wrong people, even when you care about them.

Holding on too long creates drag across the organization and limits who the company can become.

Hard truth: Protecting the future sometimes means making uncomfortable decisions today.

Simplicity Beats Complexity in Growth Planning

Many growth plans fail because they’re too complex to execute.

Bryan Boettger (Estate Four) introduced a powerful framework using fidelity levels:

Low fidelity for long-term vision (3–5 years)

Medium fidelity for near-term priorities

High fidelity for immediate execution

Clear milestones and stage gates matter more than detailed forecasts.

Execution Risk Is a People Problem, Not a Technology Problem

As businesses scale, leaders often underestimate change management.

Josh Santiago (Santiago & Company) explained that execution fails when teams aren’t prepared for new systems, processes, or expectations—even when the strategy is sound.

Key insight: If people don’t believe the plan is achievable, it won’t work.

Sustainable Growth Depends on Leadership Maturity

The panel closed with a simple but critical reminder:

Your leadership team must grow as fast as your business.

That means:

Delegating early

Building leadership pipelines

Valuing truth-seekers over yes-people

Using data to ground decisions

Designing a business that doesn’t rely on the founder for everything

Connect with the Panelists

Justin Janowski – Founder, Faith2Influence
High-integrity sales strategies for coaches and entrepreneurs
🌐https://www.faith2influence.com
🔗https://www.linkedin.com/in/justinjanowski/
🎁 Get his free 10-step sales process by texting SALES to 55444

Josh Santiago – Managing Partner, Santiago & Company
Management consulting focused on unlocking portfolio value
🌐https://www.santiagocompany.com
🔗https://www.linkedin.com/in/joshsantiagokc

Philip Williams – Principal, The Numbers Advisors
Bookkeeping clarity and value-driven exit planning
🌐https://www.thenumbersadvisors.com

Bryan Boettger – Principal & Lead Strategist, Estate Four
Strategy and execution for construction and industrial brands
🌐http://www.estatefour.com
🔗https://www.linkedin.com/in/bryanboettger/

Final Thought

Scaling isn’t about moving faster.
It’s about building the structure, leadership capacity, and clarity to grow without breaking what already works.

If scaling your business is stretching your time and focus, an Ultimate Executive Assistant from Workergenix can help you reclaim 15–30 hours a week and lead with clarity. 

Book a discovery call to see how the right executive support creates growth without chaos.

Like what you read? Get weekly insights on scaling, efficiency, and profitability—straight to your inbox. Click here to subscribe.

Transcript:

Harley Green:
All right, welcome everyone to Executive Edge Live. I’m Harley Green, founder and CEO of Workergenix. Now at Workergenix, we help high-performing leaders reclaim time and focus by pairing them with Ultimate Executive Assistants who reduce operational drag and increase leadership bandwidth. These sessions are one way that we support the broader business community with real conversations about what actually works at scale.

Today’s conversation is going to be focused on vision and planning for scalable growth. Very appropriate here for the new year. A lot of leaders don’t really struggle with vision so much as they struggle with the bandwidth side of things. And when everything runs through you and your calendar is full, even strong plans and vision can stall.

So today we’re unpacking how leaders can set growth targets that are ambitious but executable, plan around real capacity, not just hope, and reduce leadership drag that quietly eats 15 to 30 hours a week so that you can build planning structures to support execution and not just strategy.

You’ll hear practical insights from real-world experiences and honest trade-offs from the leaders who’ve built growth plans that hold up under pressure, our amazing panelists. And a quick note before we begin, today’s session will also be featured on our podcast, Scale Smart, Grow Fast. So if something resonates with you today, you’ll be able to revisit again in the conversation later, wherever you get your podcasts.

So let’s go ahead and dive right in and get to know our panelists. Justin, let’s start with you. Go ahead and introduce yourself to our audience today.

Justin Janowski:
Hey, thanks for having me. I’m Justin Janowski. I run a company called Faith to Influence, and I help Christian coaches and entrepreneurs as my primary target audience with high-integrity sales strategies. I know that many people who are building businesses are trying to figure out the right pricing, the right irresistible offer, and the right sales strategy to grow.

And for my audience specifically, sales is the thing they want to do the least, but they need the most. And so I help people do that really well in a way that feels good for them and their prospects, that has integrity, and makes it easy for the right people to say yes.

Harley Green:
Thank you so much, Justin, for joining us. Josh, how about you?

Josh Santiago:
Absolutely. Thank you so much. It’s a pleasure to be here. My name is Josh Santiago. I’m one of the managing partners and founder of a firm that I started called Santiago & Company. So we are a management consulting firm that specializes in helping mid-market enterprise companies isolate and identify portfolio value across the entire chain and then really dive into that.

So this is a conversation that’s near and dear to my heart because I spend a lot of time helping organizations, even at the very top, uncover these issues and really dial it back. So it’s nice to get back into the small business side of things and help give back there.

Harley Green:
It’s great having you here today, Josh. All right, Philip, how about you? Can you introduce yourself?

Philip Williams:
Good morning. Thank you for having me, Harley. I appreciate the invitation. Super cool to be on the panel with all these cool chaps here. I run an advisory firm that handles bookkeeping so that business leaders can get their numbers on time. Massive frustration for a lot of us.

And then on the backside, we also do exit planning advising, which deals a lot with building value in the business and expanding the valuation on the company before an owner decides to exit.

Harley Green:
Thank you so much, Philip. And last but certainly not least, Bryan, go ahead and introduce yourself to the audience.

Bryan Boettger:
Thank you. Brian from Estate Four. I’m the principal and lead strategist. I’ve been in the agency and consultant space for like 25 years now and worked across a variety of spots. American Express, Google, YouTube, Toyota, all kinds of things, but also smaller companies as well.

And I focus now predominantly on the construction and industrial space. So that’s kind of where I found my home at this point in time.

Harley Green:
As you can see, we’ve got a power-packed panel here today. So let’s just dive right in with the first question here. This is open to everyone. So if you’ve got something you want to share, please just jump right in.

And the first question today we’re going to focus on is scalable growth. When you think about scalable growth, what do you see leaders most often getting wrong in their planning?

Philip Williams:
I’ll jump in. The number one thing is they think it’s going to happen faster and less expensively than it really is. Whatever your number is, probably you should add 50 percent on time and money.

Josh Santiago:
I think the other thing too that I see is capacity. I think planning around capacity to hit scalability is another one. It’s a huge underinvestment. Everybody thinks they’ve got unlimited bandwidth and we all love the five to nine, but it’s one of those things that you’ve got to balance capacity as well across the organization.

Bryan Boettger:
If we’re looking at leaders, and I think a lot of what you’re focusing on is leadership, I think it’s important to identify the difference between leadership and management and what role you’re filling within that. And too often people focus on the what and the how instead of the why and the where.

And as a true leader, if you focus on where we’re going and why we want to get there, and then you either offload or collaborate with your team for the what and how, that’s the only way it’ll work in the long term.

Justin Janowski:
For me, I’ll add that sustainability is one of the key components leaders need to think about. How can we grow in a way that’s sustainable, a way that feels good long term, that supports the lifestyle we want, the business we want, the culture and values of the business?

And so it’s about having the right people in place, the right systems and processes so that the scaling isn’t just an exciting moment, but something that’s lasting and done the right way.

Harley Green:
I heard you.

Bryan Boettger:
Also, the scaling aspect, it’s not like a final destination either. One of the problems is people just look at what’s that end goal instead of looking at what are the milestones to get there.

And people try to do goal setting or don’t even do goal setting at all. It’s crazy how often people don’t set goals. They just say, “We’re going to grow, we’re going to do whatever,” but not only setting an end goal, but what are the stage gates to get there so you can do quality checks as you go.

Harley Green:
One of the things that I’ve heard here in this discussion was that sometimes leaders can underestimate the amount of effort or resources that it’ll take. Why do you guys think that is? Especially people who’ve been in business more than a year and understand that things are harder than they often look on the surface. Why do leaders continually fall into that trap, and what tips or strategies would you offer for them to be more realistic?

Justin Janowski:
A lot of leaders are visionary types. They see the big goal, the big picture, and where they want to go. They’re great at communicating that, and there’s often a charisma around their ability to sell people on it and get people excited.

But many leaders are missing the integrator, the down-to-earth analytics of what it’s actually going to take to make that vision come alive. And so partnering with team members and trusted advisors, coaches, mentors, and others who can see what actually has to happen to bring the vision to life is really important.

Many visionaries just have the big idea and they start sharing it before the path is clear.

Josh Santiago:
I think Justin brings up a great point. It’s the marriage between the visionary and the integrator. If you look at a lot of great companies throughout history, Apple with Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak, Microsoft with Bill Gates and Paul Allen, there was always a strong visionary and an equally strong executor.

And I think that becomes such a hard thing to do sometimes when you’re just getting started or even when you’ve been in business for a few years, finding somebody you can tie yourself to who’s not only going to help push the vision forward, but also bring you back to reality.

You’re like, “Yeah, we’re going to grow 40 percent next year,” and it’s like, “Well, we don’t even have the staff to do that. Hold on just a second.” Finding the two is super helpful.

Philip Williams:
I’ll just add that as an entrepreneur, the fundamental thing that allows us to do what we do is also an Achilles heel. And that is this: entrepreneurs are like adolescents in their inability to assess risk.

We are willing to leave the house without a bunch of guaranteed green lights to get across town. There are other people that need to know every light is going to be green when they get there. So you need somebody to help compensate for your positive success wiring.

Josh Santiago:
Well said.

Philip Williams:
As you’re saying, you need somebody to help compensate for your positive success wiring.

Bryan Boettger:
I think one way to mitigate against that, and I totally agree one hundred percent, is something I actually did when I started this company from my last one. I did a lot of self-assessment around what my risk level was and how I protect myself from myself.

But in general, looking at the companies we work with, you have to ask whether your success is because your company is reactive to customer needs or proactive to customer needs. If you’re reactive, scalability and growth are going to be harder. If you’re proactive, that usually means you’re more ready.

Another way to look at that is people versus process. Are you successful because of your people solely, or are you successful because you have process? If you actually have that foundational process piece, then that’s something you might be able to grow and sustain.

Philip Williams:
And do you have a process for finding people?

Josh Santiago:
Yeah.

Bryan Boettger:
Yeah.

Harley Green:
Absolutely. Brian, back to you. You touched on this a little bit. You’ve spent your career helping organizations simplify their strategies. Where do growth plans usually become too complex to execute? And how can leaders create clarity without oversimplifying?

Bryan Boettger:
A great visual that helps a ton is thinking about fidelity levels, like looking at a picture and how pixelated it is. If you look at a billboard up close, it’s totally pixelated, but from far away it has clarity even with low fidelity.

As you get closer, you need higher fidelity. Our phones are high fidelity because they’re right in front of our faces. Strategy should work the same way. Start with low fidelity for three to five years. Personally, I think anything beyond five years is a fool’s quest.

Then bring it in two-thirds for medium fidelity. Then bring it in another third for high fidelity. You increase fidelity as you get closer to execution.

Harley Green:
Josh, any input on the fidelity piece of goal strategy?

Josh Santiago:
Yeah, I love this because we practice it at the corporate level, and I like bringing it back down. I’ve done a lot of work with nonprofits. McKinsey developed the Three Horizons model years ago.

Horizon One is where you’re at today, the core business sustaining the organization. Horizon Two has commercial viability but isn’t widespread yet. Horizon Three is where visionaries love to play. No EBITDA impact yet, just ideas.

Where people get out of sorts is sequencing. You should spend about seventy percent of your time in Horizon One, high fidelity, what you’re working on today. Thirty percent in Horizon Two. And ten percent in Horizon Three so visionaries don’t feel stifled.

That balance keeps execution moving while allowing innovation.

Harley Green:
That’s a great breakdown of time and resource allocation. Justin, you work closely with founders setting ambitious income and impact goals. How do you help leaders stretch without overwhelming capacity or values?

Justin Janowski:
We want goals that stretch us but stay in the realm of possibility. Some people advocate setting unachievable goals so you land somewhere good. I prefer something we actually believe we can achieve.

Belief changes behavior. When the leader and team believe the goal is achievable, they act differently. The goal should require a new version of you, but still feel possible.

It’s different for everyone. Sometimes it’s a smell test. Does it feel true? One of my mentors would say, “I hear what you’re saying, but I don’t believe it yet.” Sometimes asking the question multiple times gets to a truer answer.

Philip Williams:
Hey Justin, have you ever heard of Edwin Locke and Gary Latham?

Justin Janowski:
I haven’t.

Philip Williams:
They published a paper in 2002 on self-belief and goal achievement. In corporate settings, you’ve probably heard someone in the back of the room say, “That’ll never happen,” when leadership announces a big goal. That’s lack of belief.

I actually helped put a company on the Inc. 5000 using that theory. Self-belief matters. If the team doesn’t believe they can do it, that’s the first gap.

Josh Santiago:
I love asking the question, “What has to be true for us to get here?” It balances vision with execution. If you want forty percent growth, what has to change? More staff, new systems, new processes?

As you hit small milestones, belief accelerates.

Philip Williams:
When you give someone a goal they’ve never achieved, and they don’t know anyone who has, you’ve lost most of the battle. There’s a physiological response that says, “I can’t do this.” You have to address that.

Justin Janowski:
That’s why breaking goals into the smallest actions matters. Whether the goal is one hundred thousand or ten million, break it into sales, calls, messages.

Often, what it takes is smaller than people think. Many solopreneurs would hit goals just by sending ten messages a day consistently.

Philip Williams:
And the complement to that is asking, what three things do you do that shoot yourself in the foot? Write them down and stop doing them.

Sometimes winning is just not losing. People delay calls, delay proposals, and let momentum slip. Stop doing those three things and results improve.

Bryan Boettger:
Parallel to that is distraction. The Eisenhower Matrix of urgent versus important is powerful. It helps you decide what to focus on, what to delegate, and what to ignore.

Josh Santiago:
Delegation is one of the biggest challenges as businesses grow. Learning to hand things off early accelerates everything.

Philip, on the exit side, when owners delegate well, does exiting become easier?

Philip Williams:
Absolutely. If you want a good multiple, you better delegate well and have a team worth delegating to. If you have those things, you might not even want to exit.

Bryan Boettger:
That theme of identifying the next generation of leaders keeps coming up. Whether exiting or not, scale requires new leaders.

If you plan to grow fast, start interviewing now. It takes time.

Philip Williams:
And investors consistently say business owners struggle to identify and develop good talent. That needs to be top of mind.

Josh Santiago:
Yeah, such a good point. I spend a lot of time coaching leaders on building that pipeline. Brian, to your point, building that next generation of leaders is so important. Not only is it expensive to hire people, but it’s even more expensive to rehire. When you bring someone along on the journey, they’re bought into the vision and running at the same pace.

It also gives them a stake in the organization. Retention goes up. Beyond that, building a runway or pipeline of talent is critical because it takes time to develop these skill sets. Leaders need to think ahead. If we’re going to grow from X to Y, what skills will people need to support that?

Many people entering the workforce want to know what the next role looks like and how to get there. Smaller organizations struggle to bridge that gap and lose people because they don’t provide a path forward. If you can show someone how to go from a junior role to the next level with a clear roadmap, they stay and buy into the vision.

Philip Williams:
And how many business owners don’t do that in the hiring conversation?

Bryan Boettger:
Especially when someone has a growth mindset, entrepreneurs often think, “I figured it out, so they should too.” But there’s that old saying: what if you don’t train them and they stay? Then you have untrained people working for you.

Sometimes training people contributes to the greater good, and hopefully you support them enough that they want to stay.

Josh Santiago:
Yeah.

Harley Green:
You’ve made some excellent points. Philip, I want to go back to you because your work focuses a lot on momentum and planning with the end in mind. What signals tell you early that someone’s growth plan won’t hold up operationally?

Philip Williams:
The first thing I look at is anecdotal. When I do an onsite for the first time, I don’t show up at 9 a.m. I meet them around 5:45 p.m. the night before and tour the office.

I look at how many desks are missing personal effects, pictures of kids, dogs, vacations. Then I look at whether the business owner understands the informal processes and communication flows. If they don’t understand that informal network, that’s a problem.

Then I look at the money. I want to see the budget, the contingency, whether credit lines are maxed out. Something will go wrong, and you’ll need a well to dip into.

Third, do they control their pipeline? If you don’t know how or why the phone rings and you’re trying to scale, that’s another issue. Culture, budget, pipeline. Those are my first three checks.

Harley Green:
Those are three critical checklist items. Josh, you’ve led large-scale transformations across industries. Where do leaders most underestimate execution risk, especially with complexity and technology?

Josh Santiago:
It’s the change management side. It’s the people side. ERP implementations are a great example. They’re critical, but they fail constantly. Accounting teams have workarounds in Excel they’ve used for years.

You try to digitize everything, nobody knows how it works, and it all breaks. There’s fear of displacement, resistance, and lack of participation. You get months in and realize processes don’t work because no one bought in.

There are usually three groups: people who fear losing their jobs, people who think technology will replace them, and people who want the change but don’t understand it. Without addressing all three, execution fails.

Bryan Boettger:
Modernization always requires good data. If data isn’t normalized, execution becomes nearly impossible. You could have great data, but if everything is one-off, it takes years to fix.

This ties back to people versus process and reactive versus proactive businesses. Normalized data allows execution without constant thinking.

Philip Williams:
I love what you’re saying, Josh. That’s where owners don’t actually know how things get done. Informal processes change after the owner leaves the room. Then a new system gets dropped in and breaks everything because leadership doesn’t understand reality on the ground.

Entrepreneurs make decisions quickly. A new idea on Friday becomes policy Monday morning. Half the team is terrified.

Josh Santiago:
So true.

Bryan Boettger:
All of this scales to large corporations too. Whether it’s one person to ten, or a department growing, these concepts repeat at every level.

Josh Santiago:
Absolutely.

Harley Green:
What strategies should leaders keep in mind when introducing new goals or plans? What should they do before presenting changes to ensure buy-in?

Justin Janowski:
One thing that helps tremendously is a quarterly deep dive focused mostly on celebrating what was accomplished. It builds trust. Every quarter, I’m surprised by how much progress we’ve made when we stop and reflect.

When teams feel seen and celebrated, they’re more willing to embrace change and make mistakes in a safe environment.

Bryan Boettger:
From a safety standpoint, a freeing question is, “What if everything we’re doing is wrong?” Truly embracing that opens up honesty. It allows people to say the uncomfortable truths because you’re asking them to.

Harley Green:
That’s a great point. Opening the floor shows you don’t have all the answers and welcome feedback. I’m listening to a book right now called Thanks for the Feedback, which covers this well.

Let’s move to a trade-off question. What’s one hard decision you’ve made or advised on that protected long-term scalability even though it was uncomfortable?

Justin Janowski:
Letting the wrong person go. I tend to hold on too long because I care. But recognizing who we need to be and whether we have the right people in the seats is critical. The sooner you make the decision, the better.

It never feels good, but it’s part of leadership. Ending things honorably matters, but avoiding it causes more damage.

Philip Williams:
I’ve had to tell owners not to scale. If you can’t take two weeks off, you’re not ready. You’ll just replicate chaos somewhere else.

Josh Santiago:
I’ve had to kill pet projects. Ideas that look good on paper but don’t align with brand or capability. Focus is hard, but necessary.

Bryan Boettger:
One hard decision I made was doubling our office space even though we weren’t using it most of the time. It created a home base and culture anchor.

Also, on letting people go, one person often affects five others. Keeping them harms more people than releasing them.

Justin Janowski:
That’s great wisdom.

Josh Santiago:
I’ve seen that too. Once a toxic high performer leaves, the culture improves instantly.

Harley Green:
We have covered some amazing topics and extracted a huge amount of wisdom from you guys today. One final lightning round question, just a couple of sentences. What’s the most important principle leaders should remember when planning to be scalable for growth this year?

Philip Williams:
I’ll go. You and your team, your leadership team, better be able to grow and learn as fast as you want your business to grow.

Justin Janowski:
Hmm.

Harley Green:
Anyone else who wants to jump in, go for it.

Bryan Boettger:
I’d say value the truth seekers. The people who challenge you and question you. Get rid of the sycophants and value the truth seekers, because that’s the only way you’re actually going to be able to grow and achieve.

Josh Santiago:
I’d say force data into every conversation. Every time you have an idea, try to find the data within the organization or within the market to back it up so you can make a qualitative and quantitative decision.

Justin Janowski:
Thanks.

Justin Janowski:
For me, I’m thinking about two things. One is building the simplest outcome-focused plan possible. The more complexity, the more things that can go wrong. Some businesses require complexity, but as simple as it can be and as outcome-focused as it can be, the better.

And for me as a sales guy, we have to have the right salespeople and the right sales process in place. Philip talked earlier about making sure the phone is ringing. What’s our process for leads and sales, and who’s going to handle them? That’s critically important to every company.

Harley Green:
So thank you again for joining us, guys. If people want to continue the conversation with you or connect with you online, we’d love to give everyone the opportunity to share the best way to connect, starting with you, Josh.

Josh Santiago:
Yeah, just visit us at santiagocompany.com. That’s the easiest way to find out what we do and get ahold of us. Or you can find me on LinkedIn at Josh Santiago KC.

Philip Williams:
You can find me online at thenumbersadvisors.com. That’s the best place to see how our advisory firm operates. And then on LinkedIn, you can look me up at Your Goals Achieved.

Harley Green:
Awesome. Bryan, you.

Bryan Boettger:
You can find us at estatefour.com, spelled out. A picture’s worth a thousand words. And feel free to hit me up on LinkedIn as well.

Justin Janowski:
Mm-hmm.

Harley Green:
And Justin.

Justin Janowski:
I’m easy to find online and on social media, but the best way to connect is actually to accept a gift I’d like to give everyone. It’s a free PDF of our 10-step sales process that’s been effective for us and our clients.

You can get that by texting the word SALES to 55444. It’ll give you the free gift, put you on our email list, and myself or someone from my team will text you. If you want to talk with me personally, just reply and say you want to talk to Justin, and we’ll get on a call and get to know each other.

Harley Green:
Thank you so much to our panelists today for the clarity and real-world insight you’ve shared with our audience. And thank you to everyone who joined us live.

Remember, scale isn’t just about growing faster. It’s about building the structure and leadership capacity to support that growth without breaking what matters.

We’ll see you all next time on Executive Edge Live and on the Scale Smart, Grow Fast podcast. Have a great rest of your day, everybody. Thank you.

How EOS Can Help You Scale Without Burning Out — Insights from Harvey Yergin

How EOS Can Help You Scale Without Burning Out — Insights from Harvey Yergin

Growing a business without a clear operating system often leads to misalignment, frustration, and stalled progress. If you’ve ever felt like your business is running you instead of the other way around, you’re not alone.

In a recent episode of the Scale Smart Grow Fast podcast, host Harley Green sat down with Harvey Yergin, a certified EOS Implementer, Army veteran, and former D1 athlete, to break down how the Entrepreneurial Operating System (EOS) brings order, clarity, and growth to leadership teams across industries.

Preferred listening on the go? Catch the full podcast episode on Spotify and Apple Podcasts.

🚨 The Problem: Chaotic Growth Without Structure

Harvey shared his own experience running a real estate business that was scaling—but painfully. The team struggled with communication, profitability, and accountability. Like many business owners, he was pouring in time and energy without seeing sustainable results.

That’s when he discovered Traction—the foundational book for EOS. Within a few pages, everything clicked.

✅ What is EOS?

EOS (Entrepreneurial Operating System) is a proven framework for helping leadership teams align on a shared vision, build healthy team dynamics, and gain traction through disciplined execution.

According to Harvey, EOS helps businesses master three pillars:

  • Vision – Get everyone 100% on the same page with where you’re going and how to get there.
  • Traction – Instill accountability and discipline to actually execute on your vision.
  • Healthy – Build a cohesive, open, and trusting leadership team.

🔧 EOS Tools That Transform Teams

Here are two powerful tools Harvey recommends for any team implementing EOS:

  • The Accountability Chart – Not your traditional org chart. It’s about defining functions first, people second. This tool helps ensure everyone is in the right seat doing the right things.
  • Core Values – These guide hiring, firing, and daily decision-making. They ensure cultural alignment across your team.

Harvey also emphasized the Level 10 Meeting, a structured weekly meeting agenda that drastically improves team communication, problem-solving, and focus. If your meetings are painful or pointless, this is a game changer.

💥 Why Most Teams Struggle (and How EOS Helps)

According to Harvey, most leadership teams fail not because they lack strategy, but because they ignore the human side—team health. Trust, vulnerability, and openness are often overlooked, yet they’re essential for growth.

He also stressed the importance of consistency and rhythm. Even self-implementing teams lose steam over time, which is why EOS emphasizes a 90-day reset cadence to re-align and re-energize leadership.

🧠 Is EOS Right for You?

EOS is industry-agnostic. Whether you’re running a landscaping company, law firm, nonprofit, or tech startup—if you’re working with people and want to grow, EOS can help.

But it’s not for everyone.

You need to be:

  • Growth-minded
  • Willing to change
  • Open to outside perspective

👊 Final Takeaway

If you’re feeling stuck, overwhelmed, or unsure of your next move—you’re not alone. EOS gives you the tools to lead with confidence, align your team, and regain control of your business.

As Harvey puts it: “There’s no shame in needing help. The real strength is in seeking it.”

🔗 Related Links:

  • Learn More About EOS
  • Contact Harvey:

Book a free discovery call with Workergenix to get the support you need to fully implement EOS and stay focused on growth. Our Ultimate Executive Assistants handle the details so you can lead with clarity and traction.

Like what you read? Get weekly insights on scaling, efficiency, and profitability—straight to your inbox. Click here to subscribe.

Transcript:

Harley Green:

Hey everybody, welcome back to the Scale Smart Grow Fast podcast. Growing a business without a proven operating system often leads to misalignment, burnout, and stalled progress. In this episode, Harvey Yergin, certified EOS implementer, Army veteran, and former D1 athlete, shares how he helps leadership teams gain clarity, traction, and team health using the Entrepreneurial Operating System. With a background spanning real estate investing, military logistics, and entrepreneurial leadership, Harvey’s going to unpack the core EOS tools that help businesses align vision, empower people, and achieve results without the chaos. Harvey, how are you doing?

Harvey Yergin:

I’m good man, thanks for having me.

Harley Green:

Yeah, thanks for being on the show with us today. Now you’ve lived many lives—from being a D1 athlete, a military leader, entrepreneur, and EOS implementer. What drew you to helping leadership teams align and grow through EOS?

Harvey Yergin:

It’s fun. It’s really fulfilling and it seems like I have an innate set of skills that make me naturally good at it, which makes me pretty fortunate to have discovered something that aligns my skills with impact. Most of the business owners and leadership teams I work with are struggling in some capacity. Maybe they’re doing well and want to do better. Maybe they aren’t doing well and want to do a lot better. I empathize with that because as a business owner and team leader, I’ve been a part of successful teams and also know what it’s like to feel lost and in need of help. I know how that feels and how it feels to get clarity and when things start clicking. That’s what I want to do for people—with the help of the EOS tools.

Harley Green:

Tell us a bit more about how you got introduced to EOS. Were you on a team that was struggling?

Harvey Yergin:

I was running a real estate business. We were flipping houses in pretty good volume. It was my first real business with a team, and I wasn’t very good at it. We were struggling to make a profit, struggling to feel like we were making progress without pouring in more time and effort. Team dynamics were lousy. I was lucky enough to be handed the book “Traction,” which EOS is based on. I finally put aside my pride and cracked it open. Within the first nine pages, it felt like the book was speaking directly to me. I started to implement the tools in my business, and the rest is history.

Harley Green:

That’s similar to my experience. I remember being on a cruise where “Traction” was recommended. I used my morning workout time to listen to the audiobook. It was incredibly powerful. I took notes, and when we got back, I immediately started implementing those things. It’s been a game changer. So, I’m excited for you to share some top recommendations from EOS. Maybe people can relate to how you were feeling—stuck in the day-to-day, with teams not performing or being profitable. How does EOS help regain clarity and focus on what really matters?

Harvey Yergin:

Clarity and focus are often second-tier symptoms. The root frustrations are that business leaders aren’t generating the kind of revenue or profit they want, they’re working more in the business than they want to—whether in hours or mental energy. They’ve tried multiple things and none have stuck. They’re frustrated with their team. They might say, “nobody wants to work these days” or “it’s hard to find talent.” If you’re experiencing those things, getting clarity and focus through EOS tools can solve them. At the highest level, EOS is about getting vision, traction, and healthy. Vision means getting your team on the same page with where you’re going and how you plan to get there. Traction is about instilling real accountability and discipline. Healthy means building teams that are open, honest, vulnerable, and enjoy working together. If you don’t have that, your team will fray.

Harley Green:

Of the three pillars—vision, traction, and healthy teams—is there one that’s hardest to get right or most often overlooked?

Harvey Yergin:

Healthy, by far. People tend to focus on the “how” of business—process, strategy, tactics. There’s not enough focus on building and maintaining a healthy, cohesive team. You can do everything else right and still fail if your team isn’t built on trust. Books like “The Five Dysfunctions of a Team” start with trust for a reason. Ignoring this is often a team’s downfall.

Harley Green:

What are some recommended tools or starting points in EOS to ensure teams have the right people and accountability?

Harvey Yergin:

Two tools: the Accountability Chart and Core Values. The Accountability Chart is the first tool we use with every team. It’s structure first, people second. Most teams build their structure around who’s already there—which doesn’t work. You need to define the functions and roles your business needs over the next 6–12 months, and then assess if your people are the right fit for those seats. Core Values are on the Vision/Traction Organizer. They define the behaviors your organization values and lives by. Use them to attract the right people and repel the wrong ones. When both tools are in place, you get the right people in the right seats.

Harley Green:

Awesome. As people go through this, what are some of the biggest blind spots leadership teams have when setting up EOS?

Harvey Yergin:

Blind spots are common. The biggest stumbling block is an unwillingness to change. EOS is a new way of doing things, and if you’re resistant to change, it won’t work. EOS is for entrepreneurial teams—growth-minded and open to being honest and vulnerable. That can be scary. But holding on to old habits is often what keeps teams stuck.

Harley Green:

Are there mindset shifts or strategies that help people embrace change when starting EOS?

Harvey Yergin:

Honestly, if you have the tools and still can’t change, you may want to talk to a personal development coach or therapist. There’s often a deeper reason behind that resistance. Having an objective third party like an EOS Implementer helps. They’ll call out when your actions don’t align with your goals. Without that external input, you just get stuck in your own loop.

Harley Green:

Speaking of alignment—what EOS tools help with improving communication and meetings?

Harvey Yergin:

The Level 10 Meeting Agenda. Meetings often suck—unproductive, boring, nothing gets done. The L10 is structured to help teams actually make decisions, move forward, and connect. It’s one of the best tools for communication and results.

Harley Green:

We implemented L10 meetings in our business—it was night and day. We saved 15 minutes off our weekly leadership meetings. Team ratings went from 3s to 8s or 9s. Everyone communicates better now. Huge fan of the L10.

Switching gears—does EOS work better for certain industries?

Harvey Yergin:

EOS is industry agnostic. I’ve worked with construction, landscaping, trucking, attorneys, a baseball team, accountants, doctors, nonprofits—you name it. If you have a team, EOS can work for you. You just need to be willing to grow and change. The tools work for businesses of one, but things click more easily once you have 10+ employees.

Harley Green:

Do companies ever lose momentum after getting started with EOS?

Harvey Yergin:

Definitely. Especially self-implementing teams. You start strong, then life gets busy. That’s why EOS is designed around a 90-day world. Every 90 days, you reconnect, refocus, and re-energize. After the initial setup, I meet with teams quarterly. They always come in frazzled—and always leave fired up.

Harley Green:

That’s a universal truth, even Gino Wickman talked about it. As we wrap up, what’s one piece of advice for leaders who want freedom without losing control?

Harvey Yergin:

I get what you’re feeling—worried you’re messing things up, questioning your decisions, maybe even scared to ask for help. Just know there are thousands of us out there who’ve felt the same. You’re not alone. Whether it’s EOS Implementers, other leaders, or business owners, support is out there. Don’t be afraid to reach for it.

Harley Green:

That’s excellent advice. Harvey, thank you so much for sharing these insights. If people want to connect or learn more about EOS, how can they reach you?

Harvey Yergin:

Go to eosworldwide.com or check out the book “Traction.” If you want to connect directly, email me at .

Harley Green:

Thanks again. If you got value from this episode, hit like and subscribe so you don’t miss future strategies to help you scale smarter. Share it with someone who needs to hear it, and if you’re on a podcast platform, leave a quick rating. It helps us reach more leaders like you. Thanks for tuning in—we’ll see you in the next one.

How to Turn Marketing Into a Measurable Growth Engine — Insights from Laura Patterson

How to Turn Marketing Into a Measurable Growth Engine — Insights from Laura Patterson

Marketing that’s busy but not strategic is one of the fastest ways to burn time, budget, and opportunity. In a recent Scale Smart, Grow Fast episode, Laura Patterson, President of Vision Edge Marketing and creator of the Circle of Traction Framework, shared how leaders can align strategy, focus on customer value, and use data to drive measurable growth.

Preferred listening on the go? Catch the full podcast episode on Spotify and Apple Podcasts.

Start with the “Straight Line Test”

Laura’s quick diagnostic: open your marketing plan and draw a straight line from your business outcomes → objectives → programs → tactics → activities. If something doesn’t connect, it’s a “random act of marketing” — and it’s stealing your strategic capacity.

Keep the Focus on Customer Value

Growth begins with understanding:

  • Who your customers are
  • What they value and need
  • How you’re different from competitors

From there, align sales, marketing, and customer success teams around clear, customer-centric outcomes.

Data + Instinct = Better Decisions

Experience and gut matter, but data turns decisions into confident moves. Avoid drowning in metrics by first deciding what question you want the data to answer. Then focus on measures tied directly to outcomes — like product adoption, share of wallet, or footprint expansion.

Make Plans Dynamic, Not Static

Markets shift fast. Laura recommends monthly reviews to check performance against targets and adjust accordingly. Use dashboards to see what’s working, what’s not, and where to pivot.

Use Advisory Boards for Real Feedback

Customer and technical advisory boards give you direct insight into pain points, opportunities, and what your audience values most. That feedback fuels innovation and relevance.

Document Processes to Delegate Effectively

From email campaigns to webinars, every marketing activity has a process. Documenting these makes it easier to delegate tasks without losing quality or consistency.


Key Takeaway:
Marketing becomes a growth engine when it’s aligned to business outcomes, rooted in customer value, and measured with discipline. Drop the random acts, focus your line, and review often.

Resources from Laura:

Schedule a discovery call to uncover how Workergenix can streamline your operations, free your time, and help you scale smarter without burning out.

Like what you read? Get weekly insights on scaling, efficiency, and profitability—straight to your inbox. Click here to subscribe.

Transcript

Harley Green: Hey everybody, welcome back to the Scale Smart Grow Fast podcast. Growth without direction often leads to wasted time, budget, and opportunity. In this episode, Laura Patterson, President of Vision Edge Marketing and creator of the Circle of Traction Framework, shares how leaders can align their strategies around customer value, streamline execution, and make smarter decisions using data. With over two decades of experience guiding hundreds of organizations, Laura is going to deliver a clear and actionable approach to turning marketing into a measurable growth engine. Laura, how are you? Thanks for being on the podcast.

Laura Patterson: Thank you for having me. I appreciate the opportunity to share my passion with your community.

Harley Green: Tell us a bit more about what brought you to being President of Vision Edge.

Laura Patterson: I won’t spend too much time there because I’d like to make sure we spend more time on things that will be helpful and actionable for your community. If you wind the clock back just a little bit, I’m in Austin, Texas. In 1999, if you could spell marketing, you could get a job. I’d been in Austin since 1982 after working for several companies, predominantly in very early stage technology. The product I was marketing, selling, and servicing ran on a Wang 2200. I was brought here by Motorola to help bring up a new organization and business line involving marketing operations, communication, and customer acquisition.

I spent the next 14 years inside Motorola and then left to go back into software. When my phone rang many times with people wanting help with strategic and product marketing and customer acquisition and retention, it was an opportunity to jump from the frying pan to the fire and start my own firm. That was the impetus and catalyst for Vision Edge Marketing, and we’ve been at it ever since.

Harley Green: Love it. Now, tell us more about the Circle of Traction Framework. How did that come about and what is it for?

Laura Patterson: The Circle of Traction has been around since the very beginning of our company. Many of our customers have used what we call “the wheel” to make sure they have the right starting point, end point, and all the things needed to move the wheel and get traction in the marketplace. We have a book on it called Fast Track Your Business, which came from a long-time customer who brought us in at various companies to talk about leveraging the Circle of Traction. On my way out from one of those meetings, John said, “When are you going to put this in a book?” I told him probably not, having already written three books, but eventually we did. The book takes everyone through each node in the Circle of Traction with actionable guidance at every step so anyone aiming to accelerate market growth with a customer-centric approach has a framework to do so.

Harley Green: You’ve worked with a ton of companies. What’s the most common reason marketing becomes disconnected from actual business growth?

Laura Patterson: I love this question. Here’s a quick test: open your marketing plan. It’s probably in Excel or PowerPoint. Many think a list of things to do, dates, and a budget is a plan. We encourage a different view. Draw a straight line from the business result you want down through objectives, programs, tactics, and activities. If anything is off that line, we call those orphans or random acts, and they steal strategic capacity.

Every day, new things pop up and you might think you should do them. Ask where it fits on the line. If it doesn’t, it’s another random act that may not move the ball down the field. That’s a simple, practical test — and we can help you fix that.

Harley Green: These random acts can be the new shiny object — tech, pipeline, trends. How do you help people stay focused and avoid shiny object syndrome?

Laura Patterson: In marketing — and sales or customer success — ask: What business outcome will this activity help achieve? If you don’t know, it’s time to discuss. Second, what exactly will we do to achieve that outcome? Third, how will you know it worked?

In marketing, we’ve made things complicated with endless activity metrics — visits, clicks, downloads, shares — but we should be measuring impact on outcomes, not just activity.

Harley Green: Many leaders rely on experience and instinct. When does that fall short, and how does data fill the gap?

Laura Patterson: I’d never tell an experienced leader their gut is irrelevant. I use mine too. But we can make more confident, faster decisions when data supports our thinking. Without it, we might keep doing things that aren’t working. Data helps us streamline the thousands of decisions we make daily. The challenge isn’t lack of data — it’s finding actionable insights.

To leverage data, start with the question you want answered. Otherwise, you risk drowning in information.

Harley Green: In a busy organization, how do you decide which data points matter for growth versus noise?

Laura Patterson: It starts with defining what success looks like for your company. Most leaders start with revenue targets, maybe profit or margin. But marketers don’t market to “buckets of revenue” — we need specific outcomes like: how many new customers in which markets for which products, how many existing customers to retain, or how to grow share of wallet.

When outcomes are customer-centric, the right metrics reveal themselves — adoption rates, share of wallet, footprint expansion — and these can guide operational plans across sales, marketing, and product teams.

Harley Green: How does the Circle of Traction help maintain that customer-centric focus?

Laura Patterson: It starts with customer insights: Who they are, what’s important to them, their challenges, aspirations, current approach, and how you can help them do it better. This informs personas, buying journeys, and strategy — then execution.

Harley Green: As marketing grows, execution can get messy. When does it make sense to delegate tasks like reporting, research, or management to an assistant?

Laura Patterson: First, document your processes. If you want others to help — whether an executive assistant, VA, or vendor — they need clear steps. Every marketing activity, from emails to events, has a process. The more detailed your documentation, the easier it is to delegate effectively.

Harley Green: How do you keep alignment from marketing through to sales?

Laura Patterson: Without guidance, sales will do whatever it takes to make the number. Give them focus — which customers, why, and what to say. This makes them more efficient and effective, targeting the right doors to knock on.

Harley Green: You’re known for helping turn marketing into performance engines. What’s step one to making it measurable and accountable?

Laura Patterson: Tie everything to clear outcomes. I’m surprised how often marketers can’t name the three to five business outcomes they’re expected to impact. Too often, plans are just last year’s plan updated. Instead, consider current market trends, target segments, and how that impacts sales, product, and customer service.

Harley Green: Who should adjust marketing strategy in response to trends — executives or marketing leaders?

Laura Patterson: It depends on company size and talent. Smaller companies may rely on leadership or outside experts. Larger ones with seasoned marketing leaders can handle it internally.

Harley Green: How often should companies revisit their marketing plan?

Laura Patterson: Frequently, especially in times of flux. I recommend monthly reviews with dashboards showing what’s working, what’s not, and where to adjust.

Harley Green: What’s the biggest missed opportunity in gathering or acting on customer feedback?

Laura Patterson: Not having customer or technical advisory boards. These provide valuable insight and a give-and-take relationship that benefits both sides. They help you understand what customers truly value.

Harley Green: For a leader stuck in reactive marketing mode, what’s one action they can take this week toward a strategic, data-driven approach?

Laura Patterson: Start by reviewing your plan — or create one. Apply the Straight Line Test. Then ask questions with “customer” in them: Which customers are buying? How long do they stay? Which have left? This will shift your thinking.

Harley Green: How can people connect with you?

Laura Patterson: On LinkedIn, by email at , or through my book Fast Track Your Business. We also offer free downloads like the customer centricity worksheet at visionedgemarketing.com.

Harley Green: Thanks, Laura. And for those listening, if you got value from this episode, hit like and subscribe so you don’t miss future strategies to help you scale smarter. Share this episode with someone who could use it, and leave us a quick rating to help us reach more leaders.

Diverse team of high-performing professionals collaborating in a modern, well-lit office, conveying productivity and efficiency."

The Hidden Cost of Overworking High Performers—And How to Fix It

The Hidden Cost of Overworking High Performers—And How to Fix It

The High Performer Dilemma

High performers are the backbone of every successful organization. They drive innovation, ensure efficiency, and push the company forward.

But instead of focusing on high-impact work, too many of these top employees are bogged down by administrative tasks, leading to burnout, disengagement, and ultimately, turnover.

While many companies assume that competitive salaries and perks are enough to retain their best talent, they fail to recognize the true burden placed on these employees.

The Leadership Oversight

  • A high performer isn’t just a strong contributor—they are a growth multiplier.
  • When they are forced to handle tasks outside their expertise, it doesn’t just waste their time—it costs the company valuable opportunities, revenue, and strategic momentum.
  • Executives must ask themselves: Are we empowering our top talent to drive success, or are we burning them out with unnecessary work?

The Numbers Don’t Lie:

✅ 30-40% of a high performer’s time is spent on low-value tasks.
✅ Replacing a high performer costs 1.5-2x their salary in recruiting, training, and lost productivity.
✅ Burned-out employees are 2.6x more likely to seek new job opportunities.

Let’s break down the true financial impact of overworking high performers.

1. Escalated Employee Turnover Costs

Burnout is a primary driver of voluntary turnover, particularly among high performers who thrive in roles where they can make an impact.

The Cost of Replacing a High Performer

  • Replacing a single high-performing employee costs 1.5-2x their annual salary.
  • In specialized industries, this figure can climb to 3-4x their salary, factoring in recruitment fees, training, and lost productivity.
  • Losing just one key employee can disrupt team dynamics and create a ripple effect of disengagement.

📊 Real-World Example:
A leading tech company faced a 15% turnover rate among top engineers, resulting in $2M+ in recruitment and training costs. By addressing workload imbalances, they reduced turnover to 5% within a year (McKinsey).

2. Productivity Decline Due to Administrative Overload

High performers are valuable because of their expertise—yet many spend their time on repetitive, low-impact tasks.

Instead of closing deals, leading teams, or innovating, they are stuck in:
✅ Email chains 📩
✅ Scheduling meetings 📆
✅ Updating CRMs & admin tasks 📊

The Financial Impact

  • If a high performer earning $100K per year spends 30% of their time on admin work, that equals $30,000 per year in wasted productivity—per employee.
  • Across a company of 50 top performers, that’s $1.5M in lost output annually.

📊 Real-World Example:
A financial services firm discovered that senior analysts spent 25% of their time on admin tasks, leading to a 20% drop in client acquisition. By shifting these tasks, they saw a $500K increase in new revenue.

3. Stifled Innovation & Growth Opportunities

When high performers are overwhelmed with operational work, they lose the capacity to think strategically and drive innovation.

Competitive Disadvantage

  • Companies with high-burnout cultures see 35% fewer new product ideas and slower revenue growth.
  • Leaders unable to focus on strategy lead to delayed decision-making, causing missed market opportunities.

📊 Real-World Example:
A tech startup found that its founders spent 60% of their time on operations instead of product development. After implementing better delegation strategies, they saw 40% faster revenue growth.

4. Presenteeism: The Hidden Productivity Killer

Burnout doesn’t always lead to quitting—sometimes, employees mentally check out while still showing up.

Why Presenteeism Is More Expensive Than Absenteeism

  • Burned-out employees make more errors, take longer to complete tasks, and have lower creativity.
  • Companies lose 10x more money due to presenteeism than absenteeism.

📊 Real-World Example:
A manufacturing firm noticed a 15% increase in product defects when employee burnout peaked. By addressing workload issues, defect rates dropped by 25% within 6 months.

5. Recruitment & Training Costs

Recruiting and onboarding new employees is expensive, but constantly replacing high performers is financially devastating.

The Financial Drain of Turnover

  • Replacing an executive or high performer costs up to 400% of their salary.
  • The time to recruit and train new talent can take 6-12 months, delaying key projects and increasing team stress.

📊 Real-World Example:
A consulting firm faced $500K in project delays due to the departure of a key leader. By optimizing workloads, they cut turnover by 30% within a year.

6. Deterioration of Company Culture & Employee Morale

When high performers leave, company morale drops, team stability weakens, and leadership effectiveness declines.

Negative Ripple Effects

  • A culture of burnout leads to higher absenteeism, lower engagement, and poor leadership retention.
  • Teams that lose key players often suffer declines in collaboration and productivity.

📊 Real-World Example:
An advertising agency saw a 25% drop in employee satisfaction after multiple top creatives left. This led to client dissatisfaction and revenue loss.

The Harsh Reality: Your Competitors Are Fixing This

Companies that proactively address these challenges are scaling faster and retaining top talent.

They’re optimizing workloads, reducing burnout, and seeing a 20-30% productivity boost.

If you don’t fix this problem, your competitors will—and they’ll win the talent and market share you’re losing.

🔥 Want to fix this? We break down the full solution in The Executive’s Guide to Scaling High Performers—so you can retain top talent, boost productivity, and scale smarter.

📩 Get your free copy now → https://workergenix.com/scaling-high-performers-guide/